Drug-Induced Macular Edema.

May 3, 2013

Makri OE, Georgalas I, Georgakopoulos CD.

Source

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, University of Patras, Rio, 26504, Patras, Greece.

Abstract

Macular edema constitutes a serious pathologic entity of ophthalmology resulting in vision loss with a remarkable impact on the quality of life of patients. It is the final common pathway of various systemic diseases and underlying intraocular conditions, with diabetes mellitus being the most frequent cause. Other causes include venous occlusive disease, intraocular surgery, and inflammatory conditions of the posterior segment of the eye. Macular edema is a recognized side effect of various systemic and local medications and requires special consideration among ophthalmologists and other clinicians. Recently, antidiabetic thiazolidinediones have been implicated in the development of macular edema, and a review of the English literature revealed that other systemically administered drugs like fingolimod, recently approved for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, the anticancer agents tamoxifen and the taxanes, as well as niacin and interferons have been reported to cause macular edema. Ophthalmologic pharmaceutical agents, like prostaglandin analogs, epinephrine, timolol, and ophthalmic preparation preservatives have also been reported to cause macular edema as an adverse event. The purpose of this article is to provide a short, balanced overview of the available evidence in this regard. The available data and the possible pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to the development of macular edema are discussed. Possible therapeutic strategies for drug-induced macular edema are also proposed.

PubMed

Extrafoveal changes following intravitreal bevacizumab injections for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: an mfERG and OCT study.

Dec 2012 

Park S, Cho IH, Park TK, Nam WH, Ohn YH.

Source

Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, 1174 Jung-dong, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon, 420-767, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the functional and structural changes of extrafoveal macula after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection in patients with macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) using multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS:

A total of 19 eyes of 19 patients with macular edema due to BRVO received three consecutive IVB injections with a 6-week interval. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), mfERG, and fluorescein angiography (FA) were performed at baseline. The macular area was divided into four quadrants (Q1-Q4) based on FA. The mean retinal thickness (MRT) and mfERG parameters in each of the four quadrants were measured at baseline and 4 weeks after the third injection.

RESULTS:

The MRT in the four quadrants improved significantly after IVB injections (p < 0.01 for Q1 and Q2, p < 0.05 for Q3 and Q4) compared to baseline. The significant improvements in mfERG responses were seen in Q1 and Q2. In Q1, there were 68 and 56 % improvement in N1 and P1 amplitude, respectively (p < 0.01). N1 and P1 amplitude in Q2 increased significantly by 43 and 46 %, respectively, compared to baseline (p < 0.05). The MRT and P1 amplitude were significantly correlated at baseline in Q1 and Q2, but no significant correlations were found after three IVB injections.

CONCLUSIONS:

The injection of IVB improved functional and structural outcomes in the primarily affected half of the extrafoveal macula effectively. The measurements of structural and functional changes using mfERG and OCT may be appropriate for monitoring the effects of IVB injection in BRVO patients.

Springer

Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: implication of VEGF as a critical stimulator

Ranibizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusions: implication of VEGF as a critical stimulator

Mol Ther. 2008 Apr

Campochiaro PA, Hafiz G, Shah SM, Nguyen QD, Ying H, Do DV, Quinlan E, Zimmer-Galler I, Haller JA, Solomon SD, Sung JU, Hadi Y, Janjua KA, Jawed N, Choy DF, Arron JR.
Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-9277, USA. pcampo@jhmi.edu

Macular edema is a major cause of vision loss in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). It is not clear how much of the edema is due to hydrodynamic changes from the obstruction and how much is due to chemical mediators. Patients with macular edema due to CRVO (n = 20) or BRVO (n = 20) were randomized to receive three monthly injections of 0.3 or 0.5 mg of ranibizumab. At the primary endpoint, month 3, the median improvement in letters read at 4 m was 17 in the 0.3-mg group and 14 in the 0.5-mg group for CRVO, and 10 and 18, respectively for the BRVO group. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed that compared to injections of 0.3 mg, injections of 0.5 mg of ranibizumab tended to cause more rapid reductions of central retinal thickening that lasted longer between injections, but in 3 months, excess central retinal thickening which is a quantitative assessment of the macular edema, was reduced by approximately 90% in all four treatment groups. There was no correlation between the amount of improvement and duration of disease or patient age at baseline, but there was some correlation between the aqueous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level at baseline and amount of improvement. These data indicate that excess production of VEGF in the retinas of patients with CRVO or BRVO is a major contributor to macular edema and suggest that additional studies investigating the efficacy of intraocular injections of ranibizumab are needed.

Nature

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema: the past, the present, and the future

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema: the past, the present, and the future

Surv Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar-Apr

Cunningham MA, Edelman JL, Kaushal S.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.

Macular edema, a condition usually associated with an underlying disease process, is a common cause of severe visual loss. There have been a variety of approaches to the treatment of macular edema; within the past few years, however, intravitreal corticosteroid treatments have emerged as an increasingly used treatment option for patients with macular edema. Intravitreal delivery allows the steroid to bypass the blood-retinal barrier, leading to a more concentrated dose of steroid for a prolonged period of time. Corticosteroids have likely been successful in the treatment of various forms of macular edema, due to their known anti-angiogenic, anti-edematous, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and anti-proliferative effects. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide has been repeatedly successful in reducing macular edema and improving visual acuity, although the duration of action is typically short-term. Due to the recurrent and chronic nature of macular edema, biodegradable implants may be the future of intravitreal steroids. Intravitreal corticosteroids are not without risks. Steroid-related side effects include cataract formation and elevated intraocular pressure. Injection-related side effects include retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, bacterial endophthalmitis, and sterile endophthalmitis. This article reviews the evolving role of intravitreal corticosteroids in the treatment of macular edema secondary to uveitis, diabetes, and retinal vascular disorders.

Elsevier

Two-year results of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Two-year results of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.

Batioglu F,
Ozmert E,
Parmak N,
Celik S.
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Mamak Street, Ankara, 06100, Turkey.

PURPOSE: To investigate 2-year results of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema unresponsive to previous laser photocoagulation.

METHOD: The study included 75 eyes of 75 diabetic patients with clinically significant diffuse macular edema that had failed to respond to previous laser photocoagulation. An intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide at the dose of 4 mg/0.1 ml was administered. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), and central macular thickness was obtained by optical coherence tomography at each visit. Intraocular pressure and lenticular status were also evaluated. Differences among measurements were evaluated by Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks. Mean follow-up period was 24.7 +/- 5.9 months.

RESULTS: The mean central macular thickness, which was obtained 3 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months postoperatively, was significantly different from the baseline measurement (P <> 0.05). During the follow-up, 29 (38.7%) eyes received re-injection of intravitreal triamcinolone. Twenty-one (28%) eyes developed intraocular pressure values higher than 21 mmHg, and 18 (24%) eyes developed cataract. Thirteen (17.3%) eyes required cataract and/or glaucoma surgery.

CONCLUSIONS: In refractory diabetic macular edema, intravitreal triamcinolone effectively reduces foveal thickness and improves visual acuity in the short term, but with the extended follow-up, the number of recurrences and steroid-related complications were shown to increase. Nevertheless, it may be a therapeutic option in some patients that do not respond to previous laser photocoagulation.

PMID: 17453151 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

Bevacizumab and the treatment of macular edema

Bevacizumab for the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion

Ophthalmologe. 2007 Mar 20
Schaal KB,
Hoh AE,
Scheuerle A,
Schutt F,
Dithmar S.
Schwerpunkt Retinologie, Universitatsaugenklinik Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland, stefan.dithmar@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

BACKGROUND: Retinal vein occlusion often leads to macular edema as a result of an elevated level of intravitreal VEGF. We report on the anatomic and functional results after intravitreal bevacizumab injections in patients with retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS: In a prospective study, 18 patients with central, and 22 patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, all of whom had persistent macular edema (>300 mum) received 2.5 mg intravitreal bevacizumab. ETDRS visual acuity, ophthalmic examination and stratus OCT were performed at baseline, 1 week after injection and then monthly. Further injections were given every 6 weeks in patients with persistent or recurring macular edema.

RESULTS: The findings did not deteriorate in any of the 40 patients. The injections (mean of 2.6+/-1.4 injections/patient) were very well tolerated in all cases during a mean follow-up of 23+/-13 weeks. On the last visit, 73.3% of patients with central retinal vein occlusion and 76.5% of those with branch retinal vein occlusion were found to have significantly improved visual acuity (by at least 3 lines). Mean central retinal thickness had decreased from 921+/-264 to 239+/-66.2 mum in patients with central retinal vein occlusion, and from 678+/-221 to 236+/-78 mum in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS: Neither intraocular nor systemic side-effects were observed in this study after repeated intravitreal injections of 2.5 mg bevacizumab. Current results suggest that intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy is a promising option in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

PMID: 17372737 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]